Did we really need another 'Meteor'?
Didn't we see this movie a couple dozen times already? And, done a hell of a lot better than this one? Armageddon, anyone? A movie with an actual story, believable characters and at least some attempt at realism? How about Deep Impact? And if memory serves, there was even a little movie in 1979 entitled, you guessed it - Meteor, with Sean Connery (and Henry Fonda as the President).
But, NBC in its infinite wisdom, must have felt disaster movies are 'in'. And hey, let's go with a meteor, that never gets old. And if rehashing a meteor movie, and doing it with lackluster actors, a ridiculously low budget and inferior effects wasn't enough, they throw in an environmental disaster flick, The Storm. (I'd also argue their summer inclusion of 'Merlin' is a different sort of disaster, but we'll stick with catastrophe movies for now).
So, to follow on the trail of my previous post: "Why are they doing this?"
I'd like to suggest that 'they' are doing it - presenting these glimpses into potential worldwide destruction - because it's all part of a larger... conspiracy is too big a word. More like, propaganda. There's a popular theory among UFO buffs that all those UFO/alien movies in the 1950's and '60s were just some sort of government plot to desensitize the American public to the idea of extraterrestrial contact. To inure us to the fact that 'they' are or could very soon, be among us. Some even claimed that the government helped fund Spielberg's Close Encounters to get the public to feel all warm and fuzzy toward the invaders.
But whether or not there was any truth to that, the same concept might apply here: desensitization. Bombard us with disaster movies. Even bad ones, cheesy as they are, have their merit - especially when the public isn't watching anything else. But take heart - there are better ones coming - a slew of them. 2012, with John Cusak, is due out this fall. Knowing just came out on DVD, and at least had an original premise and a little twist. One of the new Fall shows is entitled Day One, about life enduring after most of civilization is wiped out.
Are they trying to tell us something? We saw a bunch of these kind of movies ten years ago, before the new millennium, feeding on our collective awe (and fear) of the momentous, if meaningless, date change. But what's the reasoning now?
Guess we'll have to wait and see - does it have anything to do with the Mayan Calendar, the 2012 end date? Does NASA have some information they're not sharing? Is it all just fear about the Swine Flu?
Whatever the case, I can only make this plea to NBC and others: at least try to make these movies different; original, and in a word - better.
Thursday, August 6, 2009
Thursday, July 2, 2009
Why Are They Doing This?
The blatant overuse of the question, "Why are you doing this?" in produced scripts, especially in suspense/thrillers, is reaching epidemic levels. Instead of actually revealing a villain's motivations through dialogue and plot, demonstrating "Why he or she is doing this", it seems that otherwise competent writers are taking this lame shortcut and just having their victims scream in terror and plead, "Why are you doing this!?"
It's the most overused line in - I'd dare say - the past ten years of produced scripts. You see it everywhere. And I'm willing to bet right now that no other phrase in screenwriting even comes close in terms of word-for-word repetitive use.
Illustrative example Number One: In a recent Heroes episode, Sylar has Claire telekinetically pinned to a wall, choking her, but she still manages to get out a question... "Why..." but she barely gets out the first word before I'm groaning, Don't Say It! But of course, this being the third season of Heroes and with the writing tumbling along with the ratings, she goes ahead and says it: "Why are you doing this?" -and I promptly reach for the remote, nearly crying, screaming my own question: "Why? Why are they - the writers - doing this?
I'd argue that "Why are you doing this?" is a question that a character should NEVER ask – one, because it's unnatural. You're running for your life, chased by a hacksaw-wielding madman, you're not stopping to ask "Please tell me, Why are you doing this?" You don't know, you don't care – you're running for your life. You can assume he's nuts and it's clear he wants to saw you in half. It's not the time or place for such a question. And second, even worse, resorting to using that phrase demonstrates a clear lack of ability on the writer's part, a failure to reveal the villain's motivations... It's an obvious 'literary' device – and a transparent one at that: as if writers are following along in some instruction manual that says, at some point, have your victim ask the monster/stalker/villain why he or she is doing 'this'.
But this ridiculous (and on-the-nose) dialogue device isn't limited to the slasher genre. Even Oscar-nominated dramas fall victim to it (and once you're on the lookout for this phrase, you find it all over). In the otherwise brilliant The Changeling, the police chief asks Angelina this question twice in the same scene.
You want other examples? You have only to flip on the TV to any movie channel or network series, and there's a good chance you'll hear it. You might want to blame Wes Craven, whose Scream (1996) illustrated the arguably first-time value of such a question (maybe once, but twice in the same movie?) Casey (the first victim) asks it of the threatening voice on the phone in the beginning, then near the end Sidney screams it out as the killers are chasing her.
Then in I know What You Did Last Summer, Julie screams "Why are you doing this?" to the rain-coated man with the hook dragging her through the mud. Do we really need that question at that time? Couldn't the writers have come up with something a little more original, not to mention realistic?
Jump ahead ten years… In The Strangers, Liv Tyler whispers the dreaded question of a bag-headed intruder after these strangers have been tormenting her for an hour. What would have worked, with far more effect, was just to have her ask, simply: "Why?" 'nuff said. But in this movie, at least the tormentor responds – and here I'll give the writers due credit for crafting the perfect response: "Because you were home."
Other examples? Did I already mention Heroes? Maybe I forget to note how the writers actually had Claire ask Sylar the same question three episodes in a row... By the third time I was cursing her genetic immortality and hoping Sylar would be so annoyed he'd just find a way to shut her up for good.
The other night I casually changed the channels and landed on CSI New York – and within one minute someone was asking Gary Sinise, "Why are you doing this?" (And as far as I could see, she was just asking him why he was doing his job).
And don't even get me started on Harper's Island… (I've lost count.)
But even the best written shows sometimes fall into this trap. In Lost, Kate asks it of Sawyer when he shows up to help take her and young Ben to the Others. But… at least she catches herself afterward, realizing how dumb it sounds, and clarifies her query: "Why are you doing this… why are you helping me?" See, I'd argue the first half of the question should have been lost in the editing room. It's so forced, lending credence to my suspicion that this phrase is somehow ingrained in writers' brains (or perhaps mandated by the powers-that-be).
Never mind that 'this' is such a vague term. Some Hollywood-types must believe it's perfect, interchangeable in any genre. Just plug it in and the word 'this' will work for every situation: from a husband cheating on his wife to a mutated freak who likes to set people on fire. Again, no need to worry about those pesky issues of character development or motivation; if you're in a rush, just force the question – Why? And, in the height of laziness, you don't even have to replace 'this' with something more colorful or revealing. Why should you ask, "Why are you stalking me through the woods with an ax and murdering all my friends, when you can just ask the stilted, unnatural-sounding, "Why are you doing this?"
I don't just blame the writers. Editors and ultimately even directors bear the same mark of shame for letting this travesty go on. But I also know how the editing process works, how painful it can be to get those red pens out and cut and slash and purify in the quest to get everything just right… which is why it's so befuddling that this phrase makes it through all that. How how can so many sets of eyes look at such an out-of-place, poorly-written and over-used phrase, and still let it stay?
Again, I'm back to believing there's some kind of conspiracy at work. Maybe someone's patented that phrase and it's part of secret WGA guidelines that one out of every five scripts needs to include it so the original writer can get a percentage.
Nothing else makes sense.
Nothing else explains… why they are doing this.
It's the most overused line in - I'd dare say - the past ten years of produced scripts. You see it everywhere. And I'm willing to bet right now that no other phrase in screenwriting even comes close in terms of word-for-word repetitive use.
Illustrative example Number One: In a recent Heroes episode, Sylar has Claire telekinetically pinned to a wall, choking her, but she still manages to get out a question... "Why..." but she barely gets out the first word before I'm groaning, Don't Say It! But of course, this being the third season of Heroes and with the writing tumbling along with the ratings, she goes ahead and says it: "Why are you doing this?" -and I promptly reach for the remote, nearly crying, screaming my own question: "Why? Why are they - the writers - doing this?
I'd argue that "Why are you doing this?" is a question that a character should NEVER ask – one, because it's unnatural. You're running for your life, chased by a hacksaw-wielding madman, you're not stopping to ask "Please tell me, Why are you doing this?" You don't know, you don't care – you're running for your life. You can assume he's nuts and it's clear he wants to saw you in half. It's not the time or place for such a question. And second, even worse, resorting to using that phrase demonstrates a clear lack of ability on the writer's part, a failure to reveal the villain's motivations... It's an obvious 'literary' device – and a transparent one at that: as if writers are following along in some instruction manual that says, at some point, have your victim ask the monster/stalker/villain why he or she is doing 'this'.
But this ridiculous (and on-the-nose) dialogue device isn't limited to the slasher genre. Even Oscar-nominated dramas fall victim to it (and once you're on the lookout for this phrase, you find it all over). In the otherwise brilliant The Changeling, the police chief asks Angelina this question twice in the same scene.
You want other examples? You have only to flip on the TV to any movie channel or network series, and there's a good chance you'll hear it. You might want to blame Wes Craven, whose Scream (1996) illustrated the arguably first-time value of such a question (maybe once, but twice in the same movie?) Casey (the first victim) asks it of the threatening voice on the phone in the beginning, then near the end Sidney screams it out as the killers are chasing her.
Then in I know What You Did Last Summer, Julie screams "Why are you doing this?" to the rain-coated man with the hook dragging her through the mud. Do we really need that question at that time? Couldn't the writers have come up with something a little more original, not to mention realistic?
Jump ahead ten years… In The Strangers, Liv Tyler whispers the dreaded question of a bag-headed intruder after these strangers have been tormenting her for an hour. What would have worked, with far more effect, was just to have her ask, simply: "Why?" 'nuff said. But in this movie, at least the tormentor responds – and here I'll give the writers due credit for crafting the perfect response: "Because you were home."
Other examples? Did I already mention Heroes? Maybe I forget to note how the writers actually had Claire ask Sylar the same question three episodes in a row... By the third time I was cursing her genetic immortality and hoping Sylar would be so annoyed he'd just find a way to shut her up for good.
The other night I casually changed the channels and landed on CSI New York – and within one minute someone was asking Gary Sinise, "Why are you doing this?" (And as far as I could see, she was just asking him why he was doing his job).
And don't even get me started on Harper's Island… (I've lost count.)
But even the best written shows sometimes fall into this trap. In Lost, Kate asks it of Sawyer when he shows up to help take her and young Ben to the Others. But… at least she catches herself afterward, realizing how dumb it sounds, and clarifies her query: "Why are you doing this… why are you helping me?" See, I'd argue the first half of the question should have been lost in the editing room. It's so forced, lending credence to my suspicion that this phrase is somehow ingrained in writers' brains (or perhaps mandated by the powers-that-be).
Never mind that 'this' is such a vague term. Some Hollywood-types must believe it's perfect, interchangeable in any genre. Just plug it in and the word 'this' will work for every situation: from a husband cheating on his wife to a mutated freak who likes to set people on fire. Again, no need to worry about those pesky issues of character development or motivation; if you're in a rush, just force the question – Why? And, in the height of laziness, you don't even have to replace 'this' with something more colorful or revealing. Why should you ask, "Why are you stalking me through the woods with an ax and murdering all my friends, when you can just ask the stilted, unnatural-sounding, "Why are you doing this?"
I don't just blame the writers. Editors and ultimately even directors bear the same mark of shame for letting this travesty go on. But I also know how the editing process works, how painful it can be to get those red pens out and cut and slash and purify in the quest to get everything just right… which is why it's so befuddling that this phrase makes it through all that. How how can so many sets of eyes look at such an out-of-place, poorly-written and over-used phrase, and still let it stay?
Again, I'm back to believing there's some kind of conspiracy at work. Maybe someone's patented that phrase and it's part of secret WGA guidelines that one out of every five scripts needs to include it so the original writer can get a percentage.
Nothing else makes sense.
Nothing else explains… why they are doing this.
Wednesday, July 1, 2009
Two weeks Until Silver and Gold's release
Counting the days...
For my second published book. A lot of preliminary work to do (long after the words have been written, edited and type-set) - such as set up a blog (finally!)
So this is the first test, more to come!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
.jpg)
